Configuration

After installation we can prepare our project for object permissions handling. In a settings module we need to add guardian to INSTALLED_APPS:

INSTALLED_APPS = (
    # ...
    'guardian',
)

and hook guardian’s authentication backend:

AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS = (
    'django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend', # this is default
    'guardian.backends.ObjectPermissionBackend',
)

Note

Once project is configured to work with django-guardian, calling migrate management command would create User instance for anonymous user support (with name of AnonymousUser).

Note

The Guardian anonymous user is different from the Django Anonymous user. The Django Anonymous user does not have an entry in the database, however the Guardian anonymous user does. This means that the following code will return an unexpected result:

from django.contrib.auth import get_user_model
User = get_user_model()
anon = User.get_anonymous()
anon.is_anonymous  # returns False

We can change id to whatever we like. Project should be now ready to use object permissions.

Optional settings

Guardian has following, optional configuration variables:

GUARDIAN_RAISE_403

Added in version 1.0.4.

If set to True, guardian would raise django.core.exceptions.PermissionDenied error instead of returning empty django.http.HttpResponseForbidden.

Warning

Remember that you cannot use both GUARDIAN_RENDER_403 AND GUARDIAN_RAISE_403 - if both are set to True, django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured would be raised.

GUARDIAN_RENDER_403

Added in version 1.0.4.

If set to True, guardian would try to render 403 response rather than return contentless django.http.HttpResponseForbidden. Would use template pointed by GUARDIAN_TEMPLATE_403 to do that. Default is False.

Warning

Remember that you cannot use both GUARDIAN_RENDER_403 AND GUARDIAN_RAISE_403 - if both are set to True, django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured would be raised.

GUARDIAN_TEMPLATE_403

Added in version 1.0.4.

Tells parts of guardian what template to use for responses with status code 403 (i.e. permission_required). Defaults to 403.html.

ANONYMOUS_USER_NAME

Added in version 1.4.2.

This is the username of the anonymous user. Used to create the anonymous user and subsequently fetch the anonymous user as required.

If ANONYMOUS_USER_NAME is set to None, anonymous user object permissions-are disabled. You may need to choose this option if creating an User object-to represent anonymous users would be problematic in your environment.

Defaults to "AnonymousUser".

See also

https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/stable/topics/auth/customizing/#substituting-a-custom-user-model

GUARDIAN_GET_INIT_ANONYMOUS_USER

Added in version 1.2.

Guardian supports object level permissions for anonymous users, however when in our project we use custom User model, default function might fail. This can lead to issues as guardian tries to create anonymous user after each migrate call. Object that is going to be created is retrieved using function pointed by this setting. Once retrieved, save method would be called on that instance.

Defaults to "guardian.management.get_init_anonymous_user".

See also

Anonymous user creation

GUARDIAN_GET_CONTENT_TYPE

Added in version 1.5.

Guardian allows applications to supply a custom function to retrieve the content type from objects and models. This is useful when a class or class hierarchy uses the ContentType framework in an non-standard way. Most applications will not have to change this setting.

As an example, when using django-polymorphic it’s useful to use a permission on the base model which applies to all child models. In this case, the custom function would return the ContentType of the base class for polymorphic models and the regular model ContentType for non-polymorphic classes.

Defaults to "guardian.ctypes.get_default_content_type".

GUARDIAN_AUTO_PREFETCH

Added in version 2.x.x.

For vanilla deployments using standard ContentType interfaces and default UserObjectPermission or GroupObjectPermission models, Guardian can automatically prefetch all User permissions for all object types. This can be useful when manual prefetching is not feasible due to a large number of model types resulting in O(n) queries. This setting may not be compatible with non-standard deployments, and should only be used when non-prefetched invocations would result in a large number of queries or when latency is particularly important.

Defaults to False.

GUARDIAN_USER_OBJ_PERMS_MODEL

Added in version 2.x.x.

Allows the default UserObjectPermission model to be overridden by a custom model. The custom model needs to minimally inherit from UserObjectPermissionAbstract. This is only automatically supported when set at the start of a project. This is NOT supported after the start of a project. If the dependent libraries do not call UserObjectPermission = get_user_obj_perms_model() for the model, then the dependent library does not support this feature.

Define a custom user object permission model

from guardian.models import UserObjectPermissionAbstract
class BigUserObjectPermission(UserObjectPermissionAbstract):
   id = models.BigAutoField(editable=False, unique=True, primary_key=True)
   class Meta(UserObjectPermissionAbstract.Meta):
      abstract = False
      indexes = [
         *UserObjectPermissionAbstract.Meta.indexes,
         models.Index(fields=['content_type', 'object_pk', 'user']),
      ]

Configure guardian to use the custom model in settings.py

GUARDIAN_USER_OBJ_PERMS_MODEL = 'myapp.BigUserObjectPermission'

To access the model use get_user_obj_perms_model() with no parameters

from guardian.utils import get_user_obj_perms_model
UserObjectPermission = get_user_obj_perms_model()

Defaults to 'guardian.UserObjectPermission'.

GUARDIAN_GROUP_OBJ_PERMS_MODEL

Added in version 2.x.x.

Allows the default GroupObjectPermission model to be overridden by a custom model. The custom model needs to minimally inherit from GroupObjectPermissionAbstract. This is only automatically supported when set at the start of a project. This is NOT supported after the start of a project. If the dependent libraries do not call GroupObjectPermission = get_user_obj_perms_model() for the model, then the dependent library does not support this feature.

Define a custom user object permission model

from guardian.models import GroupObjectPermissionAbstract
class BigGroupObjectPermission(GroupObjectPermissionAbstract):
   id = models.BigAutoField(editable=False, unique=True, primary_key=True)
   class Meta(GroupObjectPermissionAbstract.Meta):
      abstract = False
      indexes = [
         *GroupObjectPermissionAbstract.Meta.indexes,
         models.Index(fields=['content_type', 'object_pk', 'group']),
      ]

Configure guardian to use the custom model in settings.py

GUARDIAN_GROUP_OBJ_PERMS_MODEL = 'myapp.BigGroupObjectPermission'

To access the model use get_user_obj_perms_model() with no parameters

from guardian.utils import get_user_obj_perms_model
GroupObjectPermission = get_user_obj_perms_model()

Defaults to 'guardian.GroupObjectPermission'.